EPA Proposes to Remove New Hampshire From Regional Air Quality Coordination
Official: Response to Clean Air Act Section 176A Petition From New Hampshire
Reading: Removing a state from the Ozone Transport Region reduces the scope of coordinated emission controls and interstate coordination that the CAA established to improve regional air quality.
If approved, this change would reduce coordination requirements for New Hampshire but may affect how New Jersey and other OTR states manage their own air quality.
In clear language
The EPA is considering removing New Hampshire from the Ozone Transport Region (OTR), a group of northeastern states that work together to reduce smog-forming pollution. New Hampshire argues it has met federal air quality standards and that controlling its emissions no longer helps neighboring states meet those standards. If approved, this change would reduce coordination requirements for New Hampshire but may affect how New Jersey and other OTR states manage their own air quality.
How does this affect you?
Pick the type of resident or organization you most identify with — we'll generate a plain-language breakdown of what changes for you and what you can do about it.
Who does this affect?
- New Jersey residents and businesses, since changes to OTR membership may affect regional air pollution controls and interstate coordination
- New Hampshire residents and industries that currently must follow stricter emission controls as part of the OTR
- Other OTR states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont) whose air quality depends on coordinated regional emission reductions
What can you do?
- Monitor EPA announcements and comment on the final rule if it affects your state's air quality standards
- Contact your New Jersey representatives if you have concerns about changes to regional air-quality cooperation
Timeline
- 2025-12-24: New Hampshire submitted the removal petition
- 2026-08-11: EPA published the proposed rule
No New Jersey official has a verified action on this policy yet.
Related policies
- Federal RegisterAug 11, 2026EPA Allows New Hampshire to Remove Its Vehicle Emissions Testing Program
New Hampshire is asking the EPA to let it remove its statewide vehicle inspection and maintenance program that checks cars for emissions pollution. The EPA is saying yes, as long as New Hampshire can prove this won't make air quality worse. New Hampshire has promised to submit a plan within a year showing how it will still meet federal air-quality standards without this program.
- Federal RegisterAug 11, 2026EPA Pauses Penalties for Arizona's Gasoline Vapor Pollution While New Rules Are Reviewed
The EPA is temporarily stopping financial penalties (called 'sanctions') that Arizona's Maricopa County was facing for not controlling air pollution from gasoline loading. This pause happens because the county submitted new rules to reduce harmful vapors released during gasoline transfers, and the EPA believes these rules fix the original problem.
- Federal RegisterAug 11, 2026EPA Approval of Arizona's Plan to Reduce Gasoline Loading Emissions
The EPA is approving Arizona's plan to reduce pollution from gasoline loading operations in the Phoenix area. The plan sets controls on volatile organic compounds (VOCs)—chemicals that contribute to smog—released when gasoline and other liquids are loaded for transport. This approval helps Arizona meet federal clean-air standards for ozone pollution.
- Federal RegisterAug 6, 2026EPA's Decision on Arizona's Air Quality Plan for Fine Dust Pollution
The EPA is reviewing Arizona's plan to control fine particle pollution (PM2.5) that damages air quality and public health. The EPA approves most of Arizona's approach but disapproves the plan submitted by Pima County, meaning that county must revise its strategy. This decision affects how Arizona regulates industrial air pollution permits going forward.