EPA proposes to weaken pollution controls on a Wyoming power plant
Official: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wyoming; Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan
Reading: The EPA proposes to withdraw a nitrogen oxide pollution-control requirement (BART closure determination) for Dave Johnston Unit 3, removing a previously mandated emission-reduction obligation.
This change would allow the plant to operate with less stringent pollution controls than previously required.
In clear language
The EPA is proposing to remove a requirement that a Wyoming coal power plant (Dave Johnston Unit 3) either close or install strict pollution-control equipment to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions that cause regional haze. The power company PacifiCorp asked the EPA to withdraw this requirement, and the EPA is agreeing to reconsider it. This change would allow the plant to operate with less stringent pollution controls than previously required.
How does this affect you?
Pick the type of resident or organization you most identify with — we'll generate a plain-language breakdown of what changes for you and what you can do about it.
Who does this affect?
- Residents in Wyoming and neighboring states downwind of Dave Johnston Unit 3 who breathe air affected by nitrogen oxide pollution and regional haze
- Air quality and public health advocates working to reduce smog and visibility impairment in the West
- PacifiCorp and its shareholders, who would avoid expensive pollution-control retrofits or plant closure
What can you do?
- Submit a public comment during the federal notice-and-comment period (check the Federal Register for the deadline) opposing the withdrawal of the pollution-control requirement
- Contact your U.S. Senator or Representative to express concern about weakening regional haze protections
- Learn more about how coal-plant pollution affects air quality in your region by visiting the EPA's regional haze webpage
Timeline
- Published in Federal Register: June 8, 2026
No New Jersey official has a verified action on this policy yet.
Related policies
- Federal RegisterApr 10, 2026Michigan Air Quality Improvement: St. Clair Area Sulfur Dioxide Standards Update
The EPA is approving Michigan's plan to improve air quality in the St. Clair area near Detroit by reducing harmful sulfur dioxide pollution from power plants. Michigan has met federal air quality standards for this pollutant, so the EPA is officially redesignating the area as having good air quality. The approval includes emission limits for the DTE Belle River Power Plant to keep pollution levels down.
- Federal RegisterMar 10, 2026EPA Approves Plan to Reduce Pollution from North Dakota Power Plant
The EPA has approved North Dakota's plan to reduce nitrogen oxide pollution from the Coal Creek power plant. This approval finalizes emissions limits and progress reports that were previously challenged in court, helping to improve air quality and reduce regional haze across the area.
- Federal RegisterJun 5, 2026EPA Fixes a Typo in the Rule Extending When Businesses Must Report Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The EPA published a correction to a rule it issued in February 2026 that moved back the deadline for certain businesses to report their greenhouse gas emissions from March 31, 2026 to October 30, 2026. The correction fixes only a typing mistake in the official document and does not change any of the actual requirements or deadlines. Businesses that emit greenhouse gases still have until October 30, 2026 to submit their annual emissions reports.
- Federal RegisterJun 4, 2026EPA Splits Philadelphia-Area Air Quality Oversight Zone Between Three States
The EPA is redrawing the air quality monitoring boundaries for a region covering parts of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and Delaware. This change splits what was one oversight area into three separate zones, while keeping the same geographic area covered overall. The redrawing follows requests from Maryland and Delaware and affects how ozone pollution is tracked and managed in New Jersey.